They contend that Manheim Township School District failed to provide the minor, I.K., with a free and appropriate public education (a “FAPE”) under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U. The Appellants, a minor child and her parents, challenge the District Court’s denial of their motion for judgment on the administrative record. 5.7, does not constitute binding precedent. 34.1(a) MaBefore: JORDAN, GREENAWAY, JR., and McKEE, Circuit Judges (Filed: May 15, 2023) _ OPINION _ This disposition is not an opinion of the full court and, pursuant to I.O.P. Marston _ Submitted Under Third Circuit L.A.R. 5-19-cv-05517) District Judge: Honorable Karen S. MANHEIM TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT _ On Appeal from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. JENNIFER K., Individually and on their own behalf, Appellants v. K., a Minor, by and through her parents Christopher K. NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _ No.
0 kommentar(er)
